Independent school boards – will you pass the test?

Boards charged with governing in the complex and competitive environment of the independent school sector are constantly challenged in understanding the regulatory, technical and economic issues facing their school. Are you confident that:

  • Your board has the right directors with the right skills;
  • Your board is providing the strategic direction and oversight to your school necessary to achieve organisational performance;
  • Your board is ready to comply with a new regulatory regime; and
  • Your board is in the best position to pass these and continuing tests.

Independent schools are significant businesses, established and governed independently on an individual school basis or as part of a system, providing one of the most important services to young people in Australia. School governing bodies, known variously as boards, councils or committees, are the key decision-making bodies for most independent schools and are responsible for issues such as a school’s educational provision, current and future development and staffing. As such, it is imperative the principals or CEOs and senior executives charged with managing schools are provided with the requisite strategic direction and guidance from the board to ensure high performance and ultimately the best results for students. Therefore, being an effective member of a school board is a challenge and requires a range of particular skills, knowledge and experience.

In meeting this challenge, particularly in an environment of heightened scrutiny of directors, it is important that all boards, including independent school boards strive to achieve high performance through leading practice governance processes and procedures. Assisting directors in their important task is Australia’s framework of regulatory and prudential oversight of boards, directors and organisations, which is next to none and provides for the level of scrutiny and accountability demanded by stakeholders. Commentators erroneously suggest the regulatory and compliance burden is becoming onerous. This is far from the case as we know high performing boards equate to high performing organisations and results.

We also know that demonstrated leading practice governance and skilled and talented boards ensure favourable acceptance from stakeholders. As highlighted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) the presence of an effective ‘corporate’ governance system, within individual companies and across an economy as a whole, assists in providing the confidence necessary for the proper functioning of a market economy (OECD, 2004). As a result, the cost of capital is reduced and organisations are encouraged to become more efficient in the use of resources. Therefore, good corporate governance and better financial performance may form a virtuous circle where improvement in one facilitates the improvement in the other.

With the establishment of the charity and not-for-profit sector’s own regulator, the Australian Charities and Not-for-profit Commission (ACNC), directors require a heightened understanding of the regulatory regime in which they operate and a clear understanding of their duties and governance requirements to ensure compliance with their role to set the strategic direction, oversee performance and manage strategic risk. As such, independent schools are looking for high performing boards to provide for the future of the sector.

Although the ACNC has described itself as a ‘benign regulator’, the recent introduction of the five governance standards should not be taken lightly. Most independent schools will identify as a charity, in one form or another, and with the focus of the ACNC primarily on the charity sector, boards of independent schools need to clearly understand the governance standards, their roles and responsibilities to ensure they are governing in the best interest of their school. Standards one, two and three (ensuring the entity acts in furtherance of its charitable status, being accountable to members and compliance with Australian laws) will not impose any additional burden. However, standards four and five, suitability and duties of ‘responsible entities’ (i.e. board members), will require risk assessment, mitigation and the introduction of process and procedure to ensure compliance.

Hard evidence, survey data, comments from independent school board members and anecdotal information suggests that boards of independent schools in Australia identify the professional development of directors, in their significant governing role, as crucial. There is no question the skills and experience of directors is critical to the growth, health and innovative spirit of the sector and for education provision as a whole.

In response to these needs, an exciting new initiative is the introduction of the Independent Schools Governance Program by Independent Schools Queensland (ISQ). Effective Governance is pleased to be part of this program, assisting ISQ in its development and delivery. The program is a flagship program developed specifically for an independent school setting where it will provide relevant, timely and enjoyable professional development to individuals of governing bodies and senior executive teams of independent schools in Queensland.

The program structure of twelve key modules comprising: defining governance roles; legal environment and directors duties; decision making supported by board processes; financial governance (two modules); compliance and policy framework; strategy and performance measures; risk framework; stakeholder engagement and networking; CEO/Principal governance and executive oversight; board effectiveness and boardroom dynamics is offered through four short courses. Each short course builds on the knowledge and experience of previous courses. Modules are facilitated through engaging two-hour workshops, with small groups of no more than 12, to encourage sharing of experiences and interactions between more seasoned directors and those new to the role.

Independent school board members know only too well that taking a seat on a governing body requires more than just agreeing to show up at a certain time and place for meetings. For example, board members need to know just what is meant by ‘governance’ as well as their roles and responsibilities. The issue of ‘governance’ is one that every organisation must consider in the context of its own unique operating environment. There was a time for many organisations when governance was seen as being full of good intentions, but of little practical application and boards were in place because the law said they had to be. However, governments and courts, not to mention the demands of stakeholders as previously mentioned, have ensured that this is no longer the case. Boards are now expected to play a leadership role while recognising ‘governance’ leadership is distinct from ‘management’ leadership; the board leads, it does not manage the organisation on a day-to-day basis.

Thus, corporate governance fundamentally relates to:

  • The process of setting, guiding and monitoring the organisation’s future direction;
  • Ensuring the organisation operates within its relevant legal and other boundaries;
  • Driving organisational performance (through the management team appointed by the governing body); and
  • Establishing appropriate internal control processes and accountability systems.

According to the OECD Directorate for Education (2005), effective school boards can contribute greatly to the success of their schools:

  • By contributing to a well-run school, boards can improve the environment of learning and teaching and lead to better student outcomes.
  • The school board’s most important decision may be selecting the school principal, an appointment which is crucial to effective pedagogical leadership of the school
  • School boards also strengthen effective governance, promote democratic participation and establish relationships between schools and the community.

As with corporate governance in other sectors, governance for schools is concerned with the systems and processes that ensure the overall direction, effectiveness, supervision and accountability of the school. Board members take ultimate responsibility for the governance of the school. Further, for school boards, governance relates to the way the board works with the principal and staff, the school community, service providers and other stakeholders to ensure the school operates within the law, and within and for the purposes established by its constitution.

Finally, independent school governing bodies are given considerable power under a constitution, providing responsibility for the school’s strategic direction, academic and general reputation, financial viability and the maintenance of high standards of conduct and probity. As such, board members must be diligent in fulfilling their duties and have an obligation to ensure they are able to meet any test relating to those duties.

References

OECD Directorate for Education. 2005. School boards – school councils: Pointers for policy development. Available: www.oecd.org/edu/school/45162909.pdf.

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). 2004. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD Publications Service.

10 COMMENTS
  1. Jane / 18 Aug 2016

    Hi

    I would like to know more about school board members.
    How long should a member serve on a school board for?
    Within a school board should there be a certain number of both men and women within one school board?
    Is there any educational requirements of board members?
    Should school board members be related to people who hold a paid job within the same school?
    It would be great if you could answer these questions or direct me to where I can seek this information.
    Thanks

    • Stephen Howell / 25 Aug 2016

      Hi Jane

      Thanks for your inquiry about school boards. I assume your inquiry is about independent school boards – including those constituted under the Corporations Act, their own Act, The Associations Incorporations Act of various States and Territories, Letters Patent or operating under the Constitutions of various religious bodies.

      In respect to your specific questions:
      • Tenure of appointment will normally be set out in the organisations Constitution or further specified in a board charter or board policy. Current leading practice indicates ten years. Leading practice tenure is based around independence with it being acknowledged that after ten years you can no longer claim to be independent.
      • Diversity of skills, background, experience and gender are very important in any board and assists considerably in defensible decision making. Boards should have a diversity policy.
      • Directors have to comply with statutory and fiduciary duties and as such require skills, experience and qualifications appropriate to the board and organisation. Boards should have policy and a skills matrix setting out qualifications required based on the organisations strategic direction and imperatives.
      • Conflict of interest and Related Party Transaction requirements and compliance with statutory and fiduciary duties as a director will dictate how relationships within management and the board are treated.

      I hope this helps. If you require further information, please let me know.

      Cheers,

      Stephen

  2. Braden Bills / 19 Oct 2016

    It’s interesting that independent school boards are so beneficial. It makes sense that they would be able to pass the test for having the right skill! It seems like they would be able to focus on more important curriculum, too. http://www.ics.nsw.edu.au/governance

  3. Megan / 21 Jul 2017

    Hi,
    I was wondering if anyone would know whether it is deemed a Conflict of Interest to be a board member (and Chair) of a Independent School board if you have children attending the school, or grandchildren who attend the school, or a child who is a teacher at the school.
    Should Independent School boards step away from, or at least limit these types of connections between board members and school students or staff?
    Thanks,

    • Effective Governance / 17 Oct 2017

      A conflict of interest exists when it is likely that a board member could be influenced, or could be perceived to be influenced, by a personal interest in carrying out their duties as a director. For example, a board member who has children attending the school on whose board the director sits must make a decision about raising school fees—this is a very clear conflict of interest.
      Boards need to recognise that there will always be conflicts of interest in any boardroom and due to the nature of school boards, independent or otherwise, the types of relationships you mention are often unavoidable and will likely be held in common with other members of the school board. As such, a parent, grandparent or carer who is on a school board needs to understand their legal responsibilities and the difference between their role as a board member and as a parent, grandparent or carer of children attending the school.
      Having a child who is a teacher at the school is somewhat different to having a child who is a student at the school, but as with any personal interest held by a board member, it can be dealt with if handled correctly. What must be remembered is that all board members have a fiduciary duty to avoid placing themselves in a position in which their own interests or the interests of another may conflict with the interests of the school.
      To avoid breaching any statutory provisions related to conflict of interest (e.g. ACNC Governance Standards, Corporations Act), the board must put in place a proper conflicts of interest policy as part of its governance framework. Other steps include:

      • Ensuring board members are trained and properly understand their conflict of interest obligations;
      • Requiring board members to disclose any material personal interests that could interfere, or be perceived to interfere with their independent judgment, e.g. the declaration of conflicts of interest should be a standing preliminary item on the agenda for school board meetings so that board members may declare any perceived or actual conflicts;
      • having any perceived or actual conflicts of interest recorded in a Conflict of Interests Register; and
      • Having properly documented procedures that outline how school board meetings should be conducted if a conflict of interest arises, e.g. the conflicted person is asked to leave the meeting while discussions and a vote on the matter about which the director is conflicted.

      A board member may give standing notice of the nature and extent of a possible conflicting interest, e.g. they have a child who is a teacher at the school. Standing notice means that the board member will not be obliged to bring his or her interest to the attention of the board every time a potentially conflicting matter arises. Where a director is seriously conflicted, i.e. they are regularly prevented from participating in boardroom discussions and decision making, they should resign from the board.

  4. Ziauddin / 08 Jan 2018

    Hi Thanks for sharing this. Can you comment if a school board can be established in Australia for an overseas school? Does the school need to be Not for profit or can it be a social enterprise /private?

    • Effective Governance / 18 Jan 2018

      There would be no governance reason as to why you could not establish a board in Australia for an overseas school. The issues will come from the fact that the country of operation may require local directors and that depending on board it would be more difficult to remotely govern a school. A school in Australia does not need to be registered as a not-for-profit (NFP) as such, but there are regulations that apply if they wish to receive government funding, so apart from a few higher education institutions, most schools in Australia are NFPs.

  5. Veronica Harris / 19 Mar 2018

    In an independent school situation where the Board consists of elected voting members plus the Principal and Business Director (as non-voting members) does having a regular in camera/ executive session make any sense?
    Also, in the same situation, should the whole Board be privy to the remuneration package offered to the Principal, or is it right that only the Board Chair be privy to the terms of the contract and the salary offered?

    • Effective Governance / 26 Apr 2018

      Hi Veronica,

      With respect to the first part of your question, having an in camera session without the presence of the Principal and the Business Director is a good way to discuss issues related to Principal and there Principal performance and remuneration, for example. It is a good idea for the Board to have a policy on these sessions, so that management can see they are a normal meeting process and not something for the Principal and Business Director to be concerned about.

      Regarding your second question, unless your constitution states that the Chair has responsibility for deciding the contract and remuneration of the Principal, it is a role for the Board as whole (i.e. voting/non-executive members) to fulfil, not just the Chair. Keeping these details secret from the non-executive members of the Board does not represent good governance.

      NOTE: This response is for your information and interest only. It is not intended to be comprehensive, and does not constitute and must not be relied on as legal advice. If you have any specific issues related to the matters discussed here you should seek advice tailored to your Board’s circumstances.

  6. Jonathan / 20 Mar 2019

    At a recent independent school Board meeting we had an “in camera” session at the start without the principal. A Board member (or members) leaked information to the principal. We have a Board code of conduct policy which appears to have been ignored. Tricky! Any thoughts or advice would be welcome.

Leave a Comment